Presented in a 2.40:1 aspect ratio, the 1080p/MVC encode displays fairly good depth throughout, creating a somewhat convincing sense of characters moving within a three-dimensional space. Separation between objects is also clean, and in some scenes, the background generates a decently appreciable illusion of distance. Sadly, that is only when the video is at its best, and it doesn't happen often enough. For the rest of the movie's runtime, the 3D presentation is pretty flat and boring, especially during dark nighttime scenes where dimensionality suddenly disappears. Although I wouldn't normally complain about the lack of gimmick photography, 'John Carter' is noticeably devoid of any pop-out effects and seriously wanting of at least one action sequence that recedes deep into the screen.
by Walter Chaw At some point, someone in some boardroom should have pushed away from the table and asked whether it was a good idea to have a subplot in their new Wonder Woman movie about a person in the Middle East wishing that colonizers would be expelled from occupied territories. (The granting of said wish subsequently leading somehow to nuclear holocaust.) I mean, with or without an Israeli actress in the lead role. Not to say it's not geometrically worse with an Israeli actress in the lead role, because it is. Look, the real wonder of WW84 is that this maybe isn't the worst thing about it. Neither is how flat it looks, or how it starts with 45 minutes of poorly-timed slapstick before shifting into absolutely deadening action sequences, a weird body-possession intrigue, and a horrifying message about how you should never wish for things because everything has consequences attached to it. With so much riding on its shoulders, the burden to be all things to all people has resulted in a vivisected monstrosity of plastic inauthenticity. WW84 additionally has one of the most beautiful people in the world--who's playing an immortal superhero--tearfully proclaim that she wants something to go right for her for once in her life. What I'm saying is, WW84 is a very particular, very limited kind of fantasy gratification that also happens to have fantasy gratification as its needlessly magical plot.
Hindi Hd 1080p Blu A Flat Movie
DOWNLOAD: https://tinourl.com/2vBFm4
THE 4K UHD DISCby Bill Chambers WW84 premiered in 4K and Dolby Atmos on HBO Max last December, but some of us, i.e., yours truly, are seeing it this way for the first time via Warner's physical 4K UHD release of the film, which presents the movie at an aspect ratio of 2.39:1 (save for a prologue and epilogue that are formatted at 1.90:1 to convey how they would've filled the screen in IMAX auditoriums), complete with Dolby Vision and HDR10+ high-dynamic range imaging--only the latter of which I was able to audit with my current tech. Finished in 4K, WW84 was shot on film in a variety of formats (Super 35, Panavision Super 70, IMAX), with some additional footage captured digitally using the Arri Alexa 65, whose sensors simulate 5-perf 65mm. This 2160p transfer contains some nice, crunchy, authentic-feeling grain--the silky-smooth bookends notwithstanding--and it seems to be better rendered than on the included Blu-ray. Where the UHD version unequivocally improves on the alternative is in terms of contrast: blacks that crush into a flat smudge in SDR have depth and detail in HDR, while bright highlights receive a boost in nits, lending heat to the sparks that fly when bullets ricochet off Wonder Woman's bracelets and giving her Lasso of Truth a palpably electric glow. I continue to find the movie strangely flat from a visual standpoint, however, even though the homogenizing yellow and teal colour grade isn't as dense in 4K. Despite the uptick in picture quality, the car chase in the desert still looks like it was shot for the old "Wonder Woman" TV series. The boss fight with Cheetah remains bafflingly dark, too, though 4K undoubtedly delivers WW84 in the best possible light. 2ff7e9595c
Komentari